Getting housing costs down across the board is critical. Low-income households
face hardship because of housing costs, which needs a targeted solution, but
risks from high house prices and excessive debts harm everyone and should also
be considered.
Policy approaches will differ across the housing system
Although there is a common objective of lowering housing costs across the
board, policy approaches must differ when addressing households of different
income levels.
It is an immutable fact that there is a cost to being housed and it is high
relative to many households’ incomes. Given these costs, the low incomes
of these households mean they will simply not be able to afford any housing at
a market rate. Clearly, these households need government support of some form,
whether as a direct income transfer or having their rents lowered by subsidy.
Governments help through a range of housing allowances and rent supplements,
including the Canada Housing Benefit.
There are concerns with such subsidies, however. They can encourage landlords
to charge higher rents and so the benefit of the subsidy goes to them rather
than the intended recipient. This is particularly a concern if supply of
housing is limited. Those receiving subsidies cannot shop across landlords to
promote competition among them and keep rents competitive.
Governments must therefore ensure that enough housing supply is available.
More social and affordable housing structures will help low-income households
directly. CMHC has implemented the National Housing Co-Investment Fund to help
in this regard. But building more social and affordable housing is not a
panacea either. International evidence suggests that households in such
structures are less likely to move to obtain better jobs. These trade-offs
explain why CMHC aimed at a comprehensive response to address the challenges
of low-income households through the National Housing Strategy.
As mentioned, households with more income also face high rents or costs of
homeownership in Canada today. Direct subsidies are not suitable in these
cases because the market could supply enough housing at a reasonable cost, so
there is no clear imperative for the government to intervene in the same way.
But the challenge we face in Canada is similar: not enough housing is being
built whether it’s for rental or homeownership.
CMHC estimated that an additional 3.5 million housing units are required to
achieve affordability by 2030.
To address this imperative, we need more private-sector investment to build
more supply in the housing market, particularly in the rental sector. To help
increase supply, CMHC introduced the Rental Construction Finance Initiative,
which aims at building more rental apartments in markets that desperately need
it. Markets like Toronto, Vancouver, Montreal, Victoria and Halifax, to name a
few. Much more needs to be done. Given income and population growth, further
action is required by all levels of government to facilitate increased housing
supply by the private sector.
So, even though there are common affordability problems across the board,
policy solutions will differ. The market will never supply units at a
low-enough cost for households with very low incomes. Governments must help.
In contrast, the market can supply housing in large numbers to the market if
they have access to skills and financing, but governments have a role to
ensure that the regulatory framework is supportive, so market demand is met.
Governments must take a system-wide view and not encourage housing supply for
low-income households by discouraging housing supply for middle-income
households.
The imperative of increasing housing supply will be even greater as Canada
seeks to attract more immigrants. As immigrants increasingly bring wealth,
many become homeowners immediately upon arrival in Canada, rather than
starting as renters. Accommodating more immigrants, therefore, means more
housing must be built across the entire spectrum.
The challenge of housing affordability needs to be tackled across the board
The burden on low-income households is clearly high, but the risks coming from
a lack of housing supply for those with higher incomes are great as well. The
financial fallout from not addressing challenges in the housing market can be
great, as we saw in many countries around the world in 2008-09. We need a
holistic approach to the housing system.
Addressing only one part of the housing continuum risks wasting resources.
Because households can move from one type of housing to another, a solution
for one part is likely pushing on one part of a balloon: Some other part of
the balloon will pop out and potentially burst the whole balloon.
A lack of supply of housing for homeownership means more households will stay
in rental, which means other households cannot move out of social and
affordable housing. The housing system is interconnected, so fixing
Canada’s affordability challenge requires a suite of policies to affect
the entire system.